If I'd knitted this pattern as written, knitting the front first, I might have frogged it and gone on to another project. I didn't. The back is done and I've completed the first repeat of the front cable. When I got to the one stitich shift (written to happen on the wrongside), I was sure that it was a mistake. I went ahead and tried it out. When I saw the shift in the next right side row, I was sure it was a mistake. I searched for errata. The pattern, Paton's Celtic Cable Vest has been around for a long time. Nothing was written. No one complained on Ravelry. I must be wrong. I tinked back, twice more. It is written to make an odd number of stitiches appear in the middle of the cable area for a seed stitich pattern. Here:

Can you see it in the upper legs of the cables? It really bugs me.

I'm at an impasse. I can skip the shift and use a reverse stockinette stitich instead of the seed stitch, or I can learn to ignore it. There is one more little thing……
The bobbles. I've never made bobbles that keep inverting themselves to show on the back side. These do.
The thrill is gone.





4 responses to “knitting blues.. 38 stitches”
Beautiful vest starts! I adore this colorway, yarn and the stitch definition created in the cables. So sorry it’s lost it’s charm for you. What’s up with the bobbles?
Hope you can find a solution that results in a finished vest. Canβt wait to see it on you.
reverse stockinette is my vote if you are taking them. Because the cable is really pretty otherwise in that yarn.
If you’re not feeling the love? Ditch it.
Gorgeous yarn for that pattern. It would be a shame to dump it.
Love the pattern – I’d missed that one, so snagged it for later. (Thanks!) (Though I think the first thing I’ll do is chart the cable. (You know, in my copious spare time…) I learned to knit in Olden Times BC (Before Charts), so I know it’s perfectly possible to work from directions, but charts totally changed my life.)
If it’s a choice between subbing reverse stock and ditching it, go with the sub.